Even the most basic aspects of child support are complicated, and family law issues can get even more complex. Sometimes one parent argues that they are not receiving enough payment from the other parent, or one parent will claim they are paying too much. Aside from fluctuating circumstances that can occur in a parent's life, at the root of concern is the effort to provide stable and consistent support for a child.

What Happens When One Parent Doesn't Pay?

Serious legal and financial consequences can result when a parent fails to pay support or only partially pays the due amount. Child support debt or past due payments are referred to as "arrears."

The parent who owes child support must pay an interest of ten percent on arrears based on the California Code of Civil Procedure (Section 685.020 (b)). Arrears can result from the debt for the welfare expenses paid to a family, failure to pay off a monthly support order, retroactive support accumulated from as early as the birth of a child, and medical costs related to the birth of a child.

Potential Consequences

Arrears or debt owed to the government for the financial support they provided to the other parent are usually not negotiable; however, arrears may be reduced or negotiated if you owe money directly to the custodial parent. If you are experiencing child support debt, you may encounter the following:

* Largely negative impact on individual credit report
* Driver's license suspension
* Social security income money collection
* Denial of passport
* Collection of finances from disability, tax refunds, and other monies you may receive


Can Debt Be Avoided?

The answer is yes. One way to prevent this kind of debt is to understand that guidelines can be modified regarding required amounts to be paid. Most parents who battle debt are not aware of the fact that support in California for children can be modified when there are changes in the children's needs, changes in either parent's finances, or changes in custody. It is important to note that modifications are not retroactive, so it is not an option to compensate a parent for not filing earlier.

By: Paul J Wallin
Whether you are a custodial parent trying to get child support from the other parent, or you are a parent who owes money to the custodial parent of your child, the experienced California child support lawyers at Wallin & Klarich can help parents reach a mutual agreement about arrear reduction, help you challenge paternity test results, or set up a paternity test. Call today at 1-888-280-6839 for a case evaluation to get child support debt paid.

Ignition Interlock Devices (also known as IIDs) are breath alcohol detection systems used to prevent/deter selected drivers from operating motor vehicles under the influence of alcohol. Essentially, IIDs work like breathalyzers, but they are connected to the dashboard and linked electrically to the ignition system. Before a driver can start the engine, he or she must blow into the device, which then analyzes the ethanol alcohol content of the breath using an electrochemical fuel cell to detect concentration. If the device reads that concentration is greater than a preset limit (usually between 0.02% and 0.04% BAC), it triggers the ignition system to lock and prevent the car from starting. If the fuel cell system does not detect a strong alcohol trace, the ignition will trigger without a problem.

To deter people from cheating the IID system, manufacturers employ something called a rolling retest. At random intervals after the ignition has been started, the device will require the driver to retest by blowing into the breathalyzer again. (This prevents drunken drivers from having friends take the test for them). If the driver fails the retest or refuses to take the retest, the device records this information and triggers the car horn to beep and the lights to flash. The only way to silence the horn and get the lights to stop flashing is to turn the car off and to retake (and pass) another breathalyzer test. (For obvious safety reasons, the IID never actually shuts down the car engine.)

Ignition Interlock Devices must be maintained and calibrated periodically. Drivers who have been court ordered to install these devices must pay for installation and maintenance. IIDs also record and log noteworthy events. If for instance, a driver attempts to remove the IID device or to circumvent it somehow or to impair fuel cell operation, authorities will be alerted and will set punishments accordingly.

California law empowers the courts to impose that IIDs be installed in cars driven by individuals who have been convicted of a DUI in California. These stipulations set out in Vehicle Code Section 14601.2, give the California courts the power to require that said individuals drive with IIDs for up to three years.

These intrusive devices can make day-to-day living exceptionally difficult. Particularly in California, where it is nearly impossible to work or do errands without a working motor vehicle. The sentencing practices vary widely depending upon the specific court your case is pending in and variables like the circumstances behind your DUI and the county you are facing charges in can have a substantial impact on whether or not you will be required to have an IID installed on your car.

Ignition Interlock Devices (also known as IIDs) are breath alcohol detection systems used to prevent/deter selected drivers from operating motor vehicles under the influence of alcohol. Essentially, IIDs work like breathalyzers, but they are connected to the dashboard and linked electrically to the ignition system. Before a driver can start the engine, he or she must blow into the device, which then analyzes the ethanol alcohol content of the breath using an electrochemical fuel cell to detect concentration. If the device reads that concentration is greater than a preset limit (usually between 0.02% and 0.04% BAC), it triggers the ignition system to lock and prevent the car from starting. If the fuel cell system does not detect a strong alcohol trace, the ignition will trigger without a problem.

To deter people from cheating the IID system, manufacturers employ something called a rolling retest. At random intervals after the ignition has been started, the device will require the driver to retest by blowing into the breathalyzer again. (This prevents drunken drivers from having friends take the test for them). If the driver fails the retest or refuses to take the retest, the device records this information and triggers the car horn to beep and the lights to flash. The only way to silence the horn and get the lights to stop flashing is to turn the car off and to retake (and pass) another breathalyzer test. (For obvious safety reasons, the IID never actually shuts down the car engine.)

Ignition Interlock Devices must be maintained and calibrated periodically. Drivers who have been court ordered to install these devices must pay for installation and maintenance. IIDs also record and log noteworthy events. If for instance, a driver attempts to remove the IID device or to circumvent it somehow or to impair fuel cell operation, authorities will be alerted and will set punishments accordingly.

California law empowers the courts to impose that IIDs be installed in cars driven by individuals who have been convicted of a DUI in California. These stipulations set out in Vehicle Code Section 14601.2, give the California courts the power to require that said individuals drive with IIDs for up to three years.

These intrusive devices can make day-to-day living exceptionally difficult. Particularly in California, where it is nearly impossible to work or do errands without a working motor vehicle. The sentencing practices vary widely depending upon the specific court your case is pending in and variables like the circumstances behind your DUI and the county you are facing charges in can have a substantial impact on whether or not you will be required to have an IID installed on your car.

By: Paul J Wallin
Our law firm has offices from San Diego to Ventura and our experienced California DUI defense attorneys know the procedures in the local court where your case is pending. The firm of Wallin & Klarich boasts a tremendous track record helping DUI defendants. Contact us today to get your questions answered and to have a case evaluation.

Everyone knows that speeding or running a red light or stop sign can result in being pulled over and given a traffic ticket for your momentary lapse in judgment. But did you know there are literally hundreds of California Vehicle Code sections you can violate every single time you get in your car? And some, even, that you don't even require you to be driving? Here is some information on the most common accident and insurance traffic violations.

Proof of insurance

You are required to carry proof that the vehicle you are driving is insured. Anytime you are questioned by an officer for proof of insurance, you must produce it or you may be cited. However, an officer may not pull you over simply for the purpose of asking if you are insured. There are two ways to be cited for breaking this law:

* If you have insurance but no proof - If you actually do have insurance but merely weren't carrying the card with you when you were pulled over, this is relatively easy to have dismissed by giving a copy of your current insurance policy or card to the court clerk. Don't forget to do this, however, as failing to provide proof of insurance is punishable by a fine of over $1,700!
* If you didn't have insurance when you were cited - If you are cited for violating this section and you simply do not have insurance, you have a big problem. Fines are extremely expensive for this infraction and if you have no proof that you do have insurance, there is not much you can do. However, if the vehicle you are driving is insured by someone else, such as your employer, it is possible to get this sort of violation dismissed. Never give wrong information to an officer about your insurance. This crime is a misdemeanor and is punishable by an even larger fine and up to five days in jail.

Mandatory Reporting of Certain Accidents

In any accident involving personal injury or damage of at least $750, all drivers must file an accident report and provide evidence of insurance. Failing to do so can result in the suspension of your license for one year. In fact, even if you are driving someone else's vehicle, you must comply with this section.

Exchange of Information at Accidents

Even if the accident in which you were involved is very minor and less than $750 worth of damage is involved, you are still required by law to exchange information with other drivers involved. If you fail to disclose your name, address, driver's license number, vehicle identification number, or insurance information, you can be found guilty of an infraction with another hefty fine. However, it is important to realize that this violation must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

By: Paul J Wallin
If you've been cited for one of the many violations dealing with accidents and insurance, it could end up costing you thousands of dollars in fines, an increase in your car insurance premiums, and even a suspension of your license. With a skilled criminal defense attorney experienced in defending traffic tickets, like those at Wallin & Klarich, however, you can fight your traffic ticket and win. Often, these sorts of tickets can be reduced to much less expensive violations or even completely dismissed. Call us today at 1-888-280-6839.

This brief article describes conservatorships in California. In general, a conservatorship is established over an adult, while guardianships apply to minors.

There are generally two kinds of conservatorships: over the person and over the estate. Many times, one conservatorship case includes both types.

To establish a conservatorship over the person, the court must find that the proposed conservatee is substantially unable to provide for their food, clothing and shelter. The petition to create a conservatorship is usually filed by a loved one or family member who recognizes the elder's inability to provide for these personal needs. In Riverside County, California, for example, the petition may be filed by the Public Guardian's Office when no family member or other interested person is available to assist.

A conservatorship over the person should occur only when no reasonable alternatives are available. A future article will discuss such alternatives, but these include informal assistance from loved ones and powers of attorney for health care decision making. Sometimes, an elder unquestionably needs assistance but will not voluntarily agree to accept it. Their deteriorating mental faculties prevent them from recognizing the need and they simply refuse any help.

When the court orders the establishment of a conservatorship over the person, it will appoint a conservator and grant that person the authority to make all necessary decisions to properly provide food, clothing and shelter for the conservatee. Often, these powers will also include the authority to make medical decisions.

To establish a conservatorship over the estate, the court must find that the proposed conservatee is substantially unable to make sound financial decisions or to resist fraud or undue influence. The circumstances necessary to show this condition usually involve an elder who fails to timely pay bills, open the mail, or respond to bank notices. A conservatorship over the estate can also be necessary when a perpetrator manipulates an elder and wrongfully takes money or property.

Alternatives to a conservatorship over the estate must also be explored. If the elder still possesses legal mental capacity, then a financial power of attorney can be created that provides a trustworthy agent the authority to assist with banking needs, bill payment and other financial decisions.

When the court appoints a conservator of the estate, then that person will be granted all powers necessary to marshal the elder's assets, receive income and make disbursements - all in accordance with the reasonable steps required to care for and maintain the elder's estate.

It is not necessary that the conservator live in the same county or state as the conservatee. Logistically, this would be the preferred choice. However, the court recognizes that the conservatee's family members may not live nearby but would still be the best choice to carry out the conservatorship duties on behalf of their loved one.

The court will require certain periodic reports and accountings by the conservator to make sure that all tasks are being performed for the sole benefit of the conservatee. This ensures that the conservator does not take advantage of the elder and allows the court to make recommendations when necessary.

Conservatorships are often a necessary legal procedure to assist those who can no longer sufficiently care for themselves. An elder law attorney can assist to make the process as easy to navigate as possible.

By: George Dickerman
George F. Dickerman is an elder law attorney in Riverside County, California, practising law for 23 years. To learn more about elder law issues, including the topic of conservatorship, and to subscribe to a free newsletter that provides valuable information on how to assist your family members and loved ones, please visit http://Elder-Law-Advocate.com